The Trojan Horse and the Prince of Persia
By Femi Fani-Kayode
''Israel
will no longer exist in 25 years''- Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali
Hosseini Khamenei , the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The
Prince of Persia is a spirit being that the Holy Bible describes as a
''principality’’. He rules over the geographical space that was once
known as Persia but that is now known as Iran.
This
is an entity that has the power to contend with even the most awesome
of God's angels. Judging from the words of Ayatollah Khamenei I have
little doubt that he is firmly under the grip of this spirit being.
When
he speaks, it is not him that is speaking but rather it is the Prince
of Persia that is speaking through him. This contribution is about the
folly of trusting such a man and the manifest danger of entering into a
nuclear arms deal with him.
Permit
me to begin with an aside. One of the consequences of the war in Syria
and Iraq is the massive inflow of refugees from the Middle East into
Europe. It is sad to see millions of people fleeing their homeland and
walking half way across the world to escape the savagery of war.
The
question that arises is this: why have Saudi Arabia and the other Arab
Gulf states refused to assist their Muslim and Arab brothers and take
them in? Mr. Paul Joseph Watson raised some pertinent points in a
contribution to Global Research. He wrote:
‘’While
European countries are being lectured about their failure to take in
enough refugees, Saudi Arabia – which has taken in precisely zero
migrants has 100,000 air conditioned tents that can house over 3 million
people sitting empty. The sprawling network of high quality tents are
located in the city of Mina, spreading across a 20 square km valley, and
are only used for 5 days of the year by Hajj pilgrims. The tents could
provide shelter for almost all of the 4 million Syrian refugees that
have been displaced by the country’s civil war. While it refuses to take
in any more refugees, Saudi Arabia has offered to build 200 mosques for
the 500,000 migrants a year expected to pour into Germany. While Europe
is being burdened by potentially millions of people who don’t share the
same culture or religion as the host population, Gulf Arab states
refuse to pull their weight, resolving only to throw money at the
problem’’.
Mr. Watsons’ observations are legitimate.
I
support the assertion that the west should take in as many Arab
refugees as possible on humanitarian grounds. However there must be a
moment of pause whilst we consider the following questions.
Is
it possible that some of those that have fled to Europe are actually
ISIS members who are using this opportunity to plant themselves in the
very heart of western civilization where they can wreak havoc? Is there
any truth in the Russian narrative that the massive exodus of Arab
refugees into Europe today is nothing short of a "Trojan horse"
invasion?
Again
is it conceivable that the refusal of the Saudis to receive any of the
refugees is borne out of the fact that the quickest way to change the
racial and religious identity of Europe and to bring greater Arab and
Islamic influence to bear on western culture and civilization is the
mass migration of millions of Muslim refugees into Europe?
This
suspicion is reinforced by the fact that instead of taking in the
refugees the Saudi authorities have instead offered to build 200 mosques
in Germany in order to cater for the migrants that seek refuge there.
Do
those voices in Europe that have called for caution in receiving the
refugees have a point? That remains to be seen. This brings us to the
very heart of this contribution and begs for an answer to the following
question.
If
such an influx of refugees into Europe has been triggered off by what
is essentially a Middle Eastern proxy war between the U.S.A and Saudi
Arabia on the one hand and Russia and Iran on the other, can one
possibly imagine the sheer carnage and massive influx that a war between
Iran and Israel would cause?
What
is happening today would be child's play when one considers that
scenario. Yet those that support the Iran nuclear arms deal fail to
appreciate the fact that strengthening Iran by lifting sanctions and
putting hundreds of billions of dollars in the Iranian governments’
coffers takes us one step closer to such a conflict.
Until
Iran renounces its intention of spreading global jihad and until the
clerics that rule that country stop their provocative rhetoric towards
Israel there can never be peace.
The
only language that terror understands is an equal dose of terror. The
policy of appeasement which the Iran nuclear deal represents is the
worst thing that could have happened and those that have put it in place
will have cause to deeply regret it.
The
greatest mistake that President Obama has made is to trust Iran. This
is a country whose leaders have continuously referred to America as the
‘’great Satan’’ and Israel as the ‘’little Satan’’.
This
is a country whose Supreme Leader opens political rallies by chanting
‘’death to America’’. This is a country whose former President, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, said that Israel would be ‘’wiped off the face of the
earth’’.
This
is a country whose leaders believe in the coming of the great Muslim
''Mahdi''- the so-called "Guided One" whose coming, according to shia
eschatology and prophecy, "will be heralded by the raising of a black
flag in Kurasan". This is a country whose leaders fully espouse the
concept of global jihad and whose constitution specifically calls for
the destruction of America and Israel.
By
this deal President Obama has given the Iranian government immense
power and a new lease of life. This is a government that is perverse in
all its ways and that presides over the affairs of a vicious and
unrelenting theocratic state. This is a government that is led by a
handful of misguided religious fanatics whose objective is to spread
radical Islam throughout the world.
This
is a government that has taken away the basic freedoms of its' own
people and held them in bondage for the last 36 years. This is a
government that exports blood, death and terror by funding terrorist
organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Mehdi Army
and many others throughout the world.
Given
all this can anyone legitimately dispute the words of the former
Foreign Minister of Israel, Mr. Avigdor Lieberman, who described the
nuclear deal as ''a surrender to terror''? On his part the Defence
Minister of Israel, Mr. Moshe Yaalon, said it is a deal that was built
on Iran's ''lies and deceit''. He went further by describing the
agreement as ''a tragedy for all who aspire for regional stability and
who fear a nuclear Iran''.
Most
instructive of all was the contribution of Israel's Education Minister,
Mr. Naftali Bennet, who warned that: ''The history books have been
re-written again today and this period will be deemed particularly grave
and dangerous''. He said, ''western citizens who get up for another day
at work or school are not aware of the fact that about half a trillion
dollars has been transferred to the hands of a terrorist superpower, the
most dangerous country in the world, who has promised the destruction
of nations and peoples. Today it may be us, tomorrow it may reach every
country in the form of suitcase bombs in London or New York. Israel has
done everything possible to warn of danger and in the end it will follow
its own interest and will do whatever it takes to defend itself'' (See
Peter Beaumonts’ article in the UK's, Guardian Newspaper, 14th July
2015).
These
men have spoken nothing but the truth and the world would do well to
listen. Sadly that does not appear to be happening because the American
government has been sold a dummy and they have taken the full plunge. I
have always viewed Obama's policies in the Middle East and North Africa
with suspicion.
In
my view he is the greatest friend that the radical jihadists have ever
had in the White House and he has done more for their cause than any
other American President. His support for the Iran nuclear deal confirms
this.
Permit
me to conclude this contribution with a word to Grand Ayatollah Sayyed
Ali Hosseini Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of
Iran and the man who said that Israel will ''no longer exist’’ in 25
years: hell will freeze over before Israel ever goes down.
Mr.
Binyamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, responded to him in
an equally eloquent manner by saying, "anyone who attacks Israel will
pay with his life".
A
word is enough for the wise. The day that Iran attacks Israel will be
the day that Iran would have signed its own death warrant. They will be
crushed beyond recognition and redemption.
No comments:
Post a Comment