Nnamdi Kanu And The Cry For Biafra
By Femi Olukayode
I
am not a Biafran and neither am I igbo. I do however believe that it is
the inalienable right of any human being or ethnic nationality to
aspire to be free and to be able to determine their own destiny. The
right of self-determination is enshrined in international law and it is
guaranteed by every moral stricture known to man.
It
is a right that has been exercised successfully over and over again in
world history and it has led to the creation of new nations which were
carved out of older ones. The denial of that right and the suppression
and persecution of those who attempt to exercise it leads to nothing but
defiance, dissent and resistance and, if not properly managed, it
eventually spills over into war and carnage.
This
has been the primary cause of most of history's most brutal civil wars,
including the American, Russian, French, English, Indian, Sri Lankan,
Sudanese, Nigerian, Angolan, Congolese, Zimbabwean, Yugoslavian,
Ukrainian, Nicaraguan, Cuban, Irish, Syrian, Libyan, Indonesian, Korean,
Vietnamese, Spanish, Iraqi, Italian, Lebanese ones and countless
others. I do not believe in violent change and neither do I believe in
war, revolution, terror or the use of arms in the pursuance of even the
most noble causes.
I
do however believe in the power of ideas and the right of any man,
woman or people to yearn to be free from bondage and to peacefully and
freely express that yearning. It is in this context that I situate my
belief in and support for those that view the Nigerian Federation as an
oppressive entity which has effectively enslaved its people in an
attempt to create what is essentially an artificial and unworkable
state.
Those
that believe in Nigeria have every right to continue to do so and to
voice their resolve to keep Nigeria one. What they do not have the right
to do is to refuse to offer the same degree of freedom of expression to
those that do not believe in a united Nigeria and who instead believe
in the peaceful dissolution of our nation to speak their minds and voice
their views. What is good for the goose is surely good for the gander.
You cannot grant one side of the divide freedom of expression whilst you
deny it to the other.
This
is all the more so because freedom of expression is the lifeblood of
any democracy. It must be accorded in equal measure to those that
believe in Nigeria and to those that do not. It is in this light that we
must consider the plight of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, the director of Radio
Biafra and the man that has been described by the Igbo World Assembly as
''Buhari's first political prisoner''.
We
may not like his style, we may not like his radio station, we may not
share his views or approve of his methods but one thing that we cannot
take from Mr. Kanu is his right to hold such views and to express them
in a peaceful and lawful manner no matter how distasteful those views
may be to some. To deny him this most basic human right is not only an
act of intellectual terrorism but it is also the most grave and barbaric
manifestation of what is essentially an evolving police state where
different or contrary views cannot be accommodated by those in power.
When
Mr. Alex Salmon and his Scottish Nationalist Party began the agitation
for the dissolution of the United Kingdom and for the establishment of
Scottish independence many years ago they were not charged to court,
locked up indefinitely or murdered by the British authorities but
instead they were eventually given the opportunity to participate in a
referendum and test their ideas. The same thing happened in the Catalan
region of Spain where the agitation for the establishment of a new
nation is compelling and very popular.
The
same thing happened a number of years ago in the Quebec region of
Canada. It also happened in a region called East Timor which opted to
leave Indonesia and in Singapore which opted to leave Malaysia. The same
process was adopted when Georgia, the Ukraine and all the other former
Soviet states opted to leave Russia and when the Czech Republic opted to
break off from Slovakia. The utility and importance of conducting a
referendum on such matters in order to determine the true will of the
people and to honor the findings of that referendum cannot be
underestimated and it remains the only path for peace.
Sadly
President Buhari who, like most in his generation, are still stuck in
the mindset of a civil war general, has refused to learn from this. The
biggest mistake and miscalculation of his administration so far is not
the ruthless implementation of its patently and monstrously unapologetic
northern and Islamic agenda but rather its absurd resolve to lock up
Mr. Kanu indefinitely and to effectively throw the key away simply
because he dared to call for the establishment of Biafra.
As
far as I am aware Mr. Kanu has not used or advocated the use of
violence whilst expressing himself and neither have any of his
supporters. One therefore wonders what has panicked the Federal
Government to such a point that they not only have to lock him up but
that they also have to violate the law of the land by not allowing him
to see his lawyer and by not presenting him before a court of law and
charging him within the constitutionally-prescribed three days.
State-sponsored
violence and intimidation, the violation of human rights, illegal
incarceration, the murder of innocents and the vicious suppression of
legitimate ideas leads to nothing but hardened hearts, greater defiance
and the spread of anger and dissent. The principle is simple and clear:
the more you fan the flame of tyranny and repression the more the
passion and fire of liberty spreads.
It
follows that the biggest favor that President Buhari's security
agencies could have done for the Biafran cause was to lock up Mr. Kanu
and thereby transform him from being a little-known secessionist into
the living symbol of the Biafran struggle, a respected freedom fighter, a
champion of the Igbo people and an internationally-acclaimed political
prisoner.
It
is no wonder that leading politicians from all over the world,
including the former Home Secretary and former Leader of the Labor Party
in the United Kingdom, Mrs. Harriet Harman QC, have called for his
release. The Russian and Israeli governments have also expressed concern
and done the same.
Their
call was the right and proper thing to do and I add my voice to that
call. I have never met or spoken to Mr. Kanu but I am moved by his
passion and courage. I am also persuaded by the logic and force of his
public assertions. He has made a compelling case for the establishment
of Biafra and millions of young Igbos from all over the world have
bought into it.
It
is left for those that do not agree with him to make a better case and
to stem the Biafran tide. That is the monumental challenge that those
that do not agree with Mr. Kanu's views or his methods have. I have not
always been on the same page with our Igbo brothers yet despite that one
thing is clear: only the callous would deny the fact that they have
suffered immeasurably in the Nigerian Federation over the last 50 years.
Only
the uninformed would deny the fact that they have been butchered,
murdered, persecuted, broken, humiliated, insulted, cheated and treated
with contempt and disdain more than any other ethnic group in the
country since July 1966.
What
the Nigerian state is confronted with in the new generation of Igbos
who refuse to be cowed is a time-bomb. Unlike their fathers they cannot
be appeased or intimidated. They are not fearful of the prospect of a
second civil war. They are not prepared to settle for crumbs and neither
do they fear death, conflict, defeat, incarceration, butchery or
persecution.
They
are imbued with a spirit that cannot be suppressed and the more they
cry ''Biafra'', the more the spirits of the millions that were
slaughtered on the Biafran side during the civil war are invoked. The
more they cry ''Biafra'', the more the souls of the hundreds of
thousands of their people that were butchered during the barbaric
pogroms in the north in the mid-60's and thereafter are remembered. The
more they cry ''Biafra'', the more they remember how their fathers were
stripped of everything after the civil war and how they have been denied
the opportunity to rise to the highest office in the land. The more
they cry ''Biafra'', the more they acknowledge and recognise the bitter
fact that the Buhari administration regard their kith and kin as nothing
more than third class citizens and pitiable prisoners of war. The worst
thing that the Nigerian authorities can do is to treat them with levity
or contempt.
They
are angry, they are fed up, they refuse to be enslaved, they want a
brighter future and they have come to realise that they have nothing to
lose. The most inappropriate thing that President Buhari can do is to
continue to underestimate the power of their resolve or the clarity of
their intent. The worst thing that they can do is to begin to jail them,
to shed their blood and to take their lives.
The
more you lock up the Biafrans, the more they will rise up. The more you
mock them, the more they will shout. The more you kill them, the more
their anger will be kindled. The more you deny them, the more they will
wax stronger. The more you treat them with disdain, the more they will
defy you. The more you treat them like slaves the more they will aspire
to break off and take their destiny into their own hands. You cannot
resist an idea whose time has come.
This
is a fact that we must all accept and it is with this in mind that I
urge President Buhari and the Federal Government to not only release Mr.
Nnamdi Kanu but also to tread with the utmost restraint and caution
when dealing with those that are agitating for Biafra.
Olukayode (formerly known as Femi Fani-Kayode) was Aviation Minister and the Director General, Presidential Campaign Organisation of the PDP in the last general election.
No comments:
Post a Comment