Re:
Court Stops Declaration Of Tai LGA Re-Run Elections Results In Rivers
The attention of the
Rivers State Chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP has been drawn to
attacks by failed governorship candidate of the APC, Mr. Dakuku Peterside,
Magnus Abe; All Progressives Congress Candidate for Rivers South East
Senatorial District, Mr. Barry Mpigi; All Progressives Congress Candidate for
Tai/Eleme/Oyigbo Federal Constituency and other members of the All Progressives
Congress, APC on His lordship, Honourable A. M. Liman, judge of the Port
Harcourt Division of the Federal High Court and the judiciary.
The Judge had in June
2016, restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC in an
interlocutory injunction from announcing any results or figures however
generated or compiled purported to be the result of the re-run election for any
or all of Khana, Bonny, Gokana, Andoni, Eleme, and Tai Local Government Areas
of Rivers State or any part of the re-run election scheduled for March 19,
2016, which election was subsequently postponed by INEC.
The Rivers State
Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Bro Felix Obuah hereby wishes to
make the following clarifications following attacks on the judge, the judiciary
and denial that such order of court exists.
1.
It is the position of the law as stated
clearly by the Supreme Court that once a suit has been filed and party involved
served, the Party can no longer do
anything, whether or not the court has made any pronouncement or order on the
subject matter in litigation
We
want to put the records straight that the Independent National Electoral
Commission, INEC was properly served and represented in court. INEC also filed
papers and joined issues with the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.
INEC
filed a counter-affidavit to the motion. INEC in the counter-affidavit denied
constituting any committee to come up with figure for declaring the re-run
elections results conducted in Rivers State on 19th March, 2016.
INEC
further denied that it has ever written up or contrived results for re-run
election conducted in Rivers State.
2.
When the Party or defendant in a suit
has been served and represented, party
has submitted himself to jurisdiction and anything he does afterwards,
adversely to the subject matter amount to self help and a mark of disrespect or
contempt of court.
It
is also a mark of irresponsibility on the part of such defendant and it
undermines the integrity of the court.
3.
It is even worse when an order has been
made against such defendant and the defendant who is being represented, cannot
claim non service with the order of court ruling, that is because, the legal
representative was in court and participated in the proceeding.
4.
If the legal practitioner had joined
issues with the claimant or plaintiff as the case may be, he has already
indicted at law, that he will be bound by whatever is the outcome of the
litigation of the subject matter.
5.
It is only when an interim order is
granted against the defendant in an exparte application that the defendant can
argue that he has not been served with the order and can go ahead to do
whatever he wants.
6.
In this case, the ruling was an
interlocutory injunction and not an interim order and the Independent National
Electoral Commission, INEC which was represented by counsel has also joined
issues and was present during proceedings of the court.
Therefore,
they need not be served with the interlocutory order, because they were in
court.
7.
The Independent National Electoral
Commission, INEC, cannot base their disobedience on the court ruling for not
being served because it goes to no issue in law.
8.
The pronouncement on Thursday August 18,
2016 by Amina Zakari, INEC National Electoral Commissioner in charge of
Operations on the purported Tai LGA re-run election on March 19, 2016, whether
oral or written, is a clear case of contempt of Court, and a violation of an
interlocutory injunction made in June 2016, because it undermines the integrity
of the court which gave an order in June 2016 restricting INEC from declaring
the result of Tai LGA.
9.
Amina Zakari’s pronouncement on Tai LGA
re-run election result is of no legal moment, because it cannot circumvent or
supercede or subsume the order of the court of law, made in June 2016 more so,
when the order is an interlocutory and not an interim order.
10.
That a press statement on the Court order was
issued by the PDP on Tuesday, August 23, 2016 however does not in any way make
or amount to the court order as fake nor should be taken to be the date of the
issuance of the court order.
Accordingly, the PDP
would take advantage of what the law says and file for contempt of court.
The PDP would also
press criminal charges against APC Candidates, who lay claim to these illegal
and criminal results, as there were no elections in Tai Local Government Area
of Rivers State, following repeated cases of violence, hijack of election
materials, killings orchestrated by members of the APC in Tai, which impeded
the election in the early hours of March 19, 2016 and prompted the suspension
of election in Tai LGA by INEC.
The PDP would also
demand to know in whose possessions were
these fake and criminal results five months after the elections in Tai LGA were
cancelled.
Signed:
Jerry
Needam
Special
Adviser on Media and Publicity
To
The State PDP Chairman, Bro. Felix Obuah.
No comments:
Post a Comment