Dr. Olawale Bolanle Babalakin (SAN) and his five companies yesterday
lost a N300 billion suit he filed against the Assets Management
Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) for freezing the companies’ bank
accounts. The suit was instituted before the Federal High Court, Lagos
and was dismissed for lack of merit with punitive cost of N10,000.
Babalakin’s companies that were joined as claimants in the suit are
Bi-Courtney Limited, Chartered Investment Limited, Resort International
Limited and Roygate Properties Limited.
Dismissing Babalakin’s suit, the trial judge, Justice Muhammed Idris,
pronounced that: “It takes me to a very important issue I wish to
address arising from the proceedings that led to this judgement. The
issue has to do with the duty of a counsel to properly and fully
represent his client. Once counsel accepts a brief from his client, he
is under a solemn professional duty to properly and fully represent the
client.
“As a repository of knowledge of law, counsel must work hard on each
individual case he is handling, in terms of researching afresh and
always keeping in touch with the facts of the case, especially at the
trial stage. This is because he is duty bound by any strategy or
procedure he adopts, and he cannot recline from it together with the
consequences flowing therefrom.
“Although the court may intervene in the face of an obvious
incompetence, it can only do so if the intervention will not occasion a
miscarriage of justice to the other side.
“In conclusion, I find no merit in this case and it is hereby dismissed.
N10,000 cost is awarded in favour of AMCON, defendant against Babalakin
and his companies.”
The claimants instituted the suit following an ex-parte order made on
September 22, 2014, by Justice Okon Abang, in suit number
FHC/L/CS/1361/2014, which stopped him from withdrawing money from all
his bank accounts in the country.
In the suit, Babalakin and his companies had sought for an order of the
court to direct AMCON to pay him a total sum of N300 billion as general
damage and aggravated and exemplary damages.
The claimants had also sought for a declaration that as at September 22,
2014, AMCON’s offer letter dated May 7, 2014, cannot create and/or
could not have created a new cause of action, either to him or the
defendant as same arose from settlement process engaged in by them in
order to resolve the dispute, which was the subject matter of several
court actions.
Babalakin and his companies also sought for a declaration that AMCON
fraudulently misinterpreted and/or concealed material facts in order to
procure the September 22, 2014 ex-parte order.
THE SUN
No comments:
Post a Comment