... Court Adjourns till January 20, 2015
The
former National Security Adviser, Colonel Sambo Dasuki (rtd) who is
standing trial over allegations of illegal possession of arms before the
Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has filed a Preliminary Objection
challenging the application by the Federal Government to revoke the bail
earlier granted to him by the court.
He
claimed that the Federal Government move was in bad taste and in utter
disregard to an earlier order that granted him permission to travel
abroad to treat his ailment as a Nigerian Citizen.
Dasuki
appeal to the Judge to dismiss the move in order to protect the
integrity of the court and the rule of law as enshrined in the
constitution that all parties in any dispute must obey court order.
At
the resumed trial, Prosecution Counsel, Oladipo Okpeseyitan SAN
informed the court that he has two applications seeking to revoke the
bail earlier granted to the accused person by the court and another
application seeking to stop the further execution of the order of the
court directing that the passport of the accused person be released to
him.
He
however told the court that he was constrained in moving the application
as he was served with the Defendant’s objection in court and needed
time to respond to it.
He subsequently applied for an adjournment.
Counsel
to Dasuki, Joseph Daudu SAN did not oppose the application on ground
the Prosecution is entitled to adequate time to enable him respond to
the objections raised by him.
After
listening to the parties, the trial judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola
adjourned till January 20, 2016 for the hearing of the preliminary
objection.
The
Federal Government had at the last adjourned date employed the services
of Okpeseyitan SAN, a private lawyer to prosecute Dasuki.
Okpeseyitan
on that day informed the court that he had filed a motion for stay of
execution of the ruling of the court which granted Dasuki permission to
travel abroad for medical treatment.
He further applied to the court to put the ruling on hold pending the outcome of the appeal in the matter.
Dasuki's
counsel, Ahmed Raji SAN in his reply then told the court that he had
just been served with the motion, adding that he needed time to respond
to the motion.
Dasuki had also stated then that
he did not at any point make a statement implicating anyone or group in
the allegation of $2billion arms purchase deal brought against him by
the Federal Government.
Raji
said his client never made such statement or name anyone to EFCC and
wondered where the authors got their information from.
"Quote
me anywhere, Dasuki has not done anything like that. It is absolutely
untrue. It is the figment of the imagination of the author aimed at
creating falsehood for reasons best known to them and Nigerians should
disregard them.
"They
are just out to scandalize the man, bring his image and character into
disrepute so that his friends and we'll wishers can run away from him.
They want him deserted and that will fail", he stated.
No comments:
Post a Comment